Update // Claire Labs partners with INSEAD AI Venture Lab to build the best feedback tool for higher education.

Human-centric AI to streamline grading and provide better feedback

Claire is an AI copilot that helps teaching staff in higher education review student work faster and provide formative feedback without adding to their workload.
Claire for institutions
Claire for institutions
4 hours
Saved each week by professors who use Claire
Built with educators from leading universities worldwide
Built for speed
Fly through submissions. Simply jot down thoughts as they come, Claire understands your intent.
3x faster
Highlight, comment, and annotate student work.
UI to add notes to assignments
UI to approve AI suggestions on student assignment
Tab, tab, tab ⇥ to approve
Claire writes repetitive grading remarks for you, which you can approve or dismiss as you see fit.
80%
of AI grading remarks receive approval by users.
Triage submissions in a universal inbox and streamline your grading workflow with Claire.
Chat with submissions and ask Claire questions. Never miss a thing - even in unstructured docs.
Review grading remarks in a dedicated rubric view, with remarks logically grouped by rubric criteria.
Share your feedback in just one click
Publish personalized feedback reports to a secure web page and share access with students in seconds.
Instantly shareable
Writing feedback is hard. Our reports combine praise with constructive criticism and actionable suggestions on how to improve.
View sample report
View sample report
Personalized feedback report generated for student
Shows a user interface dialog to publish a feedback report to the web
Publish your feedback
Share feedback with students on a dedicated domain protected by an access code to keep your feedback secure and private.
Secure and private

Formative, personalized feedback that finally scales

Claire generates meaningful feedback directly from your annotations — based on the latest research and insights in feedback usefulness, engagement, and impact.
A screenshot of Claire's feedback report
“Most of my notes went straight to the bin once I finished grading. Now they turn into beautiful feedback that my students love me for.”
Alexander Mathias Hein (Adj. Professor)
Hong Kong Baptist University
Designed for transparency and ethical use of AI in education
Why not use ChatGPT?
Compared to foundational LLMs such as ChatGPT, Claude, or DeepSeek, our human-as-approver approach ensures full transparency and guarantees an ethical use of AI.
Claire
Workflow
End-to-end, user as approver
Transparency
Full transparency through referencing
Feedback
Integrated, automated reports
Time to value
Out of the box
Foundational LLMs
Workflow
Fragmented, user as reviewer
Transparency
Limited, requires investigation
Feedback
Requires manual work
Time to value
Requires manual setup, prompt engineering
VS
Stay in full control. Our human-centric approach ensures that nothing ever gets past you.
Shows a grading remark awaiting user response
Ethical, responsible AI
AI suggestions remain pending and won't be visible to students unless you explicitly approve them.
Shows Block references in a side panel
Transparency built-in
AI suggestions link back to the specific part of a student submission they reference, making it easy for you to dive into the details if needed.