Behind your feedback

Learn how Claire's feedback reports are generated and how we use Artificial Intelligence to help professors and lecturers provide you and your peers with personalized feedback that scales.

We've designed our feedback reports with two objectives: a) to make it easier for educators to provide personalized feedback to each of their students, and b) to deliver insightful, easy-to-understand feedback to you.

Given the often large class sizes at universities, you can imagine that creating personalized feedback reports for students is an extremely tedious task for educators. And that's where we come in.

We support educators with a suite of tools (including Artificial Intelligence) that makes creating and sharing feedback with you easier and more scalable.

Report structure

Our feedback reports consist of three distinct parts:

  1. Feedback summary
  2. Rubric breakdown
  3. Suggestions

Feedback summary

The feedback summary is a summary of all the notes (e.g. comments) your professor or lecturer made when grading your work. To make it easier to read, we use AI to transform those notes into the written feedback that you are familiar with.

We do not invent, assume, or infer any feedback that was not explicitly given or approved by your professor or lecturer.

It's important to emphasize that we do not invent, assume, or infer any feedback that was not explicitly given or approved by your professor or lecturer. This ensures the feedback you receive is authentic and accurately reflects your professor's or lecturer's observations and their take on your performance.

Rubric breakdown

For each distinct rubric criterion, we provide a quick overview of your performance. This process is similar to how we create your feedback summary.

Each section acknowledges your strengths and discusses areas for improvement, all based on your professor's remarks. You can view further explanations by hovering over each breakdown criterion.

Suggestions

We use AI to identify the core skills you should improve on and conduct a targeted "how-to" search to find practical resources that directly address the specific skill gap.

We then evaluate the search results to ensure that we only suggest top-quality, accessible resources:

  1. 100% Free: No hidden costs or sign-ups
  2. Easy to Understand: Clear, concise content for you
  3. Highly Relevant: Precisely focused on the specific skill(s)
  4. Credible Sources: Prioritizing reputable platforms

Finally, we suggest the top 2-3 resources we think will help you improve your work in the future.